Technology in Theology: Comparative Analysis of A.I. Academic Integrity Policies in Faith-Based Education Syllabi through Durkheim’s Theory of Moral Regulation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63931/pasrj.v6i1.89

Keywords:

Academic Integrity, AI Policy Guidelines, Faith-based Education, Qualitative Multi-Document Analysis, Theological Framework, Moral Regulation Theory

Abstract

This study analyzed different AI policy guidelines reflected in syllabi of faith-based education in higher education in order to come up with recommended policies addressing digital equity and the requirements for ethical disclosure of AI use in an academic instruction setting. The study used a Qualitative Multi-Document Analysis approach on selected faith-based syllabi from a mix of sectarian universities and colleges to extract explicit AI statements, academic integrity clauses, and assignment instructions from the 2025–2026 academic years. Thematic lenses related to regulatory, pedagogical, and theological notions were applied for the study’s analytical framework. Drawing on Durkheim’s theory of moral regulation, the study emphasized that institutional policies on AI serve not only as technical guidelines but also as collective norms that preserve ethical order, spiritual values, and the integrity of human-centered mentoring. The study concluded that integrating AI into faith-based education syllabi requires a carefully crafted policy approach that balances technological efficiency with the preservation of ethical and spiritual values. This study proposed five research-based public AI policy recommendations for faith-based syllabi in congruence with UNESCO’s AI guidelines, frameworks from the Commission on Higher Education (CHED), and De La Salle University’s Policy for Generative AI in Education.

Author Biography

  • Venicris M. Alonsozana, EdD, De La Salle University - Dasmariñas, Philippines

    Dr. Venicris M. Alonsozana is a Full Professor at De La Salle University – Dasmariñas, Philippines. He specializes in Values Education and Religious Education, with a sustained commitment to advancing scholarship in these fields. His research interests encompass educational pedagogies, campus ministry, and the sociology of religion, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach that bridges pedagogy, faith formation, and sociological inquiry. As a published author and editorial leader, Dr. Alonsozana contributes to academic discourse through rigorous research, curriculum development, and values-driven educational frameworks.

References

[1] Adventist University of the Philippines. (2025). Personal Spirituality and Faith syllabus. Adventist University of the Philippines.

[2] Ateneo de Manila University. (2025). Faith, Spirituality, and the Church syllabus. Ateneo de Manila University.

[3] CHED. (2021). Philippine National AI Strategy Roadmap 2021–2025. Commission on Higher Education.

[4] De La Salle University. (2025). Faith Worth Living Carefully syllabus. De La Salle University.

[5] De La Salle University. (2025). Policies on Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education. Office of the Provost.

[6] DTI & DICT. (2024). Philippine National AI Strategy Roadmap (Updated 2024). Department of Trade and Industry & Department of Information and Communications Technology.

[7] Durkheim, É. (1995). The elementary forms of religious life (K. E. Fields, Trans.). New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1912)

[8] Mormando, F. (2023). Responsible use of artificial intelligence in education: A traffic light framework. Journal of Educational Technology Ethics, 12(3), 45–60.

[9] UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-29

How to Cite

Alonsozana, V. (2026). Technology in Theology: Comparative Analysis of A.I. Academic Integrity Policies in Faith-Based Education Syllabi through Durkheim’s Theory of Moral Regulation. Philippine Association for the Sociology of Religion Journal, 6(1), 121-130. https://doi.org/10.63931/pasrj.v6i1.89