The History and Theology of Mary’s Title as Mother of the Church: A Sociology of Religion Perspective through Durkheim and Weber

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63931/pasrj.v6i1.86

Keywords:

Blessed Virgin Mary, Durkheim collective conscience, Mother of the Church, Sociology of religion, Weber vocational calling

Abstract

Pope Francis, on February 11, 2018, decreed that an ancient devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary, under the title “Mother of the Church,” be inserted into the Roman Calendar and be celebrated annually on the Monday after Pentecost. The inclusion of this feast highlights the importance of Mary’s maternal role in the mystery of the Church and renewed reflection on the meaning and implications of this Marian title. This study employs historical-theological research to trace the development of Mary’s title as Mother of the Church and examines its significance in the contemporary life of the Church. In presenting the said theme, the discussion is structured into these three major themes: first, the Historical Development of Mary’s Title as Mother of the Church, which traces its emergence from early Christian writings to the Second Vatican Council; second, Biblical and Theological Foundations by exploring the scriptural and doctrinal basis for Mary’s maternal role; and third, Maternal Presence in the Life of the Church by examining post-Vatican II documents, devotions and Marian shrines that illustrate her ongoing guidance in the Church. This title of the Blessed Virgin Mary encourages the growth of the maternal sense of the Church in the pastors, religious, and faithful. Through the promotion of this title, the invocation to Mary seeks to foster among the faithful the growth of genuine Marian piety. This reflection is further enriched by Durkheim’s notion of the collective conscience, which situates Marian devotion as a unifying moral force within the Church, and Weber’s concept of vocational calling, which frames Mary’s maternal presence as inspiring the faithful toward lived responsibility and service. These sociological insights deepen the understanding of how the Marian title functions not only theologically but also socially in shaping communal identity and religious practice.

Author Biography

  • Andrew Joseph Chanco, University of Santo Tomas

    Andrew Joseph S. Chanco is currently pursuing a Doctor of Philosophy in Theology at the Graduate School and serves as a faculty member of the Institute of Religion at the University of Santo Tomas (UST). He graduated in 2014 with a Bachelor of Secondary Education, major in Religious Education at UST. In 2018, he earned his Master in Religious Studies, major in Catechetics, cum laude at the Don Bosco Center of Studies.

References

[1] Anderson, C., & Chavez, E. (2009). Our Lady of Guadalupe: Mother of the civilization of love. Image.

[2] Buby, B. (1997). Mary of Galilee (Vol. 2, Woman of Israel – Daughter of Zion). St. Pauls.

[3] Callegaro, F. (2021). In defense of collective consciousness: Reassessing Durkheim’s argument. In J. C. Alexander & P. Smith (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Émile Durkheim.

[4] Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments. (2018, February 11). Decree on the celebration of the Blessed Virgin Mary Mother of the Church in the General Roman Calendar. Vatican.va.

[5] Deiss, L. (1972). Mary, daughter of Sion. Liturgical Press.

[6] Dodd, G. F. (2006). “Mother of the Church”: An examination of the 1964 designation. Marian Studies, 57(1).

[7] Dollen, C. (1989). Listen, Mother of God: Reflections on the Litany of Loreto. Our Sunday Visitor.

[8] Durkheim, E. (1997). The division of labor in society (W.D. Halls, Trans.). Free Press. (Original work published 1893)

[9] Elbert, J. A. (1958). Mary and the Church. Marian Studies, 9(1), 22–30.

[10] Flannery, A. (Ed.). (1984). Vatican Council II: The conciliar and post-conciliar documents (Vol. 1). Paulines Publishing House.

[11] Gambero, L. (1999). Mary and the Fathers of the Church. Ignatius Press.

[12] Gambero, L. (2000). Mary in the Middle Ages. Ignatius Press.

[13] John Paul II. (1987). Redemptoris Mater. Pauline Books & Media.

[14] John Paul II. (1997, March 5). General audience. Vatican.va.

[15] John Paul II. (1997, May 28). General audience. Vatican.va.

[16] John Paul II. (2003). Rosarium Virginis Mariae. Paulines Publishing House.

[17] John Paul II. (2004, August 15). Homily at Lourdes. Vatican.va.

[18] Kalberg, S. (2014). Max Weber’s comparative-historical sociology. Polity Press.

[19] Leo XIII. (1895). Adiutricem. Vatican.va.

[20] Mentel, Andrej. (2025) “Marian Devotion and Social Integration: The Pilgrimage to Our Lady of Olovo.” Slovak Ethnology. 73(4).

[21] McLellan, J. (2023, August 5). Pope calls for new Marian devotion at Fatima: Our Lady in a hurry. USCCB.

[22] Miravalle, M. (Ed.). (2007). Mariology: A guide for priests, deacons, seminarians, and consecrated persons. Seat of Wisdom Books.

[23] Olsen, L. (2024). Mary & the Church at Vatican II: The untold story of Lumen Gentium VIII. Emmaus Road Publishing.

[24] Paul VI. (1964, November 21). Address at the conclusion of the third session of the Second Vatican Council. Vatican.va.

[25] Paul VI. (1967). Signum magnum.

[26] Paul VI. (1974). Marialis cultus. Daughters of St. Paul.

[27] Pius XII. (1957). Le pèlerinage de Lourdes. Vatican.va.

[28] Roten, J. G. (2015). “Mater Ecclesiae”: History, theology, and consequences. Marian Studies, 66(1).

[29] Vatican Council II. (1964). Lumen gentium. In A. Flannery (Ed.), Vatican Council II: The conciliar and post-conciliar documents (Vol. 1). Paulines Publishing House.

[30] Weber, M. (2002). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism (P. Baehr & G.C. Wells, Trans.). Penguin Books (Original work published 1905)

Downloads

Published

2026-05-29

How to Cite

Chanco, A. J. (2026). The History and Theology of Mary’s Title as Mother of the Church: A Sociology of Religion Perspective through Durkheim and Weber. Philippine Association for the Sociology of Religion Journal, 6(1), 108-120. https://doi.org/10.63931/pasrj.v6i1.86