Revisiting the K-12 Reform in the Philippines: Stakeholder Satisfaction, Challenges, and Sociological-Philosophical Insights on Values, Lived Experiences, and Educational Transformation

Authors

  • Editha De Regla Bulacan State University-Bustos Campus, Bulacan, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63931/pasrj.v6i1.67

Keywords:

Curriculum reform, Lived experiences, Stakeholder satisfaction, Sociology of religion, Values education

Abstract

The K–12 Curriculum Reform in the Philippines presented a significant education transformation designed to improve educational quality, strengthen employability, enhance global competitiveness, and promote holistic learner development in a rapidly changing global landscape. It also emphasized the integration of values education, spirituality, and social studies to nurture morally upright, socially responsible, culturally aware, and spiritually grounded individuals who can actively contribute to national development and global citizenship (Republic Act No. 11476, 2020). Anchored in the sociology of education and sociology of religion, this study analyzed stakeholders’ satisfaction and lived experiences, framed by philosophical inquiries into values and educational transformation, experienced challenges, and sociological insights on the transformation to evaluate how global reform ideals satisfied the program implementation and local educational realities. Using a descriptive research design, google form survey data were gathered from teachers, students, parents, school administrators, and industry representatives. Using a descriptive research design, google form survey data were gathered from teachers, students, parents, school administrators, and industry representatives. Mean and frequency results revealed positive levels of satisfaction among school-based stakeholders, particularly teachers and school administrators.  However, findings identified challenges in infrastructure, socio-economic pressures, and values integration, particularly in aligning curriculum with industry expectations, teacher preparedness, and religious education’s role in holistic formation on families and alignment gaps, that is between curriculum, industry expectations and teacher’s preparedness. Notably, industry stakeholders expressed comparatively lower level of satisfaction, indicating gaps between intended learning outcomes and market demands. The challenges experienced highlighted urgent priorities in enhanced learning resources, stronger employability alignment, and strengthened curriculum and teacher capacity. Notably, the strongest recommendation was to revisit the program’s implementation, ensuring resilience, values-driven refinement, and integration of spirituality and philosophical inquiry in curriculum development, signaling a call for strategic review of the K-12 reform under Republic Act No. 10533, a clear call for strategic refinement and responsive improvement of the Department of Education.

Author Biography

  • Editha De Regla, Bulacan State University-Bustos Campus, Bulacan, Philippines

    Dr. Editha Nicolas- De Regla is a General Science and Education professor of Bulacan State University – Bustos Campus. She holds a Doctor of Philosophy degree with specialization in Educational Management. She is a published book author and Scopus-indexed researcher committed to quality assurance, curriculum development, research advancement, and extension leadership.

References

[1] Abragan, F. Q., Abarcas, V., Aquino, I. M., & Bagongon, R. E. (2022). Research review on K 12 curriculum implementation in the Philippines: A generic perspective. European Journal of Educational & Social Sciences, 7(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7272126

[2] Anderson, E., Cunningham, K. M. W., & Richardson, J. W. (2024). Framework for implementing improvement science in a school district to support institutionalized improvement. Education Sciences, 14(7), 770. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070770

[3] Ball, S. J. (2023). The education debate (4th ed.). Policy Press.

[4] Barrot, J. S. (2023). K to 12 curriculum reform in the Philippines: Towards making students future ready. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 43(4), 1193–1207. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2021.1973959

[5] Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). Sage Publications.

[6] De Leon, M. S., De Regla, E. N., & Estrella, E. A. (2017). Level of acceptance of the community and industry to the K+12 senior high school curriculum in selected municipalities of Bulacan. International Journal of Educational Management and Research, 1(1), 69–72. https://doi.org/10.22662/IJEMR.2017.1.1.069

[7] Department of Education (DepEd). (2022, May 20). DepEd unveils features of 2022 K–12 curriculum in stakeholder forum. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2022/05/23/deped-unveils-features-of-2022-k-12-curriculum-in-stakeholder-forum/

[8] Department of Education. (2022). Basic education development plan 2030. https://www.deped.gov.ph

[9] Department of Education. (2023). Basic education report 2023. Department of Education Philippines.

[10] Department of Education. (2022). MATATAG agenda: Bansang makabata, batang makabansa. Department of Education. https://www.deped.gov.ph/matatag/

[11] Guo, Y., Shi, J., & Zhai, X. (2024). Questionnaire validation and reliability testing in educational technology research. Education and Information Technologies, 29(2), 2345–2362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11987-4

[12]Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2023). Multivariate data analysis (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.

[13] Heath, C. (2023). What is descriptive research? Dovetail, Journal of Young Pharmaceutics, ResearchGate.

[14] Heath, R. (2023). An introduction to quantitative research methods. Sage Publications.

[15] Novela, C. C., Custodio, J. F., Moreno, R. M. G., Bambalan, A. M., Llarenas, S. M. Q., Sibayan, B. M., Bueno, M. L., Piso, J. A. L., Asunio, J. D., & Patacsil, F. F. (2024). Filipino students’ perceptions on the implementation of K to 12 program: Qualitative text analysis. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8(6), e2025172. https://www.malque.pub/ojs/index.php/mr/article/view/6404?utm_source=chatgpt.com

[16] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Education at a glance 2023: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e13bef63-en

[17] Philippine Institute for Development Studies. (2023). Assessment of the K–12 program: Labor market alignment and policy directions. PIDS Discussion Paper Series No. 2023-XX. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://www.pids.gov.ph

[18] Philippine Institute for Development Studies. (2023). Assessment of the K to 12 program implementation: Final report. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://pids.gov.ph/

[19] Republic Act No. 11476. (2020). An Act Institutionalizing Good Manners and Right Conduct and Values Education in the K to 12 Curriculum. Supreme Court E-Library

[20] UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education—A tool on whose terms? UNESCO.

[21] World Bank. (2023). Improving learning outcomes in the Philippines: Policy directions for basic education reform. World Bank Group.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-25

How to Cite

De Regla, E. (2026). Revisiting the K-12 Reform in the Philippines: Stakeholder Satisfaction, Challenges, and Sociological-Philosophical Insights on Values, Lived Experiences, and Educational Transformation. Philippine Association for the Sociology of Religion Journal, 6(1), 67-79. https://doi.org/10.63931/pasrj.v6i1.67